The Permanente Journal

Search the Journal 
  Site Index
TPJ Home pageBrowse The JournalSubscribe to TPJInstructions for AuthorsContinuing Medical EducationAnnouncementsLinksJournal StaffEmail Us


••Fall 2001/Vol. 5, No. 4

Comments from the Journal EditorsLetters to the EditorAbstracts from articles published in other journalsArticles from our Medical DirectorsArticles on KP research contributions
Clinical articles on the practice of Permanente medicine
Poetry, Art, Musings from Permanente cliniciansEthics in medicine
Articles from a Systems perspective
Permanente History
Nonclinical articles on external issuesHumor tied to practice of medicineBook Reviews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinical Contributions


 

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Epilepsy
By Sirichai Chayasirisobhon, MDa; Spiridon Koulouris, MDb;
Elizabeth Parker, PhDc; Ngoc Leu, R.EEG/EPT, CNIMd;
Bruce Enos, MDe; Leslie Cahan, MDf; Karen Earnest, PhDg;
Jane Hwang, MDh; Kathleen Principe, BS, R.EEG/EPT, CNIMi;
Jeffrey S Schweitzer, MDj

Abstract

Context: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a relatively new treatment for epilepsy. Past studies have proposed that the antiepileptic action is related to the effect on the brainstem reticular activating system, and is mediated largely by the widespread release of two inhibitory agents (gamma aminobutyric acid [GABA] and glycine).
Objective: To confirm the safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in postmarketing clinical practice.
Design: Prospective case series.
Intervention: Implantation of a device for vagus nerve stimulation (the NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) system) in 24 patients with refractory epilepsy and monitoring their condition for six months.
Main outcome measures: Frequency and type of postoperative seizures.
Methods: Under general anesthesia, the Neurocybernetic Prosthesis was implanted in subcutaneous tissue on the upper left side of the chest by a neurosurgeon. Antiepileptic drug dosages were stable before patients entered the study and were not changed or adjusted during the six-month study period. The patients were evaluated with the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-10).
Results: During the six-month study period, 14 patients had partial seizures with and without generalized seizures; 10 patients had multiple types of generalized seizures. Of the 24 patients, 15 (62.5%) had > 50% reduction in seizure frequency after NCP implantation; eight of those 15 patients had > 90% reduction in seizure frequency. Nine (37.5%) of the original 24 patients showed no clinically significant benefit. The seizure types that responded best to VNS were atonic, tonic, and generalized tonic-clonic. Partial seizure showed moderate response. Partial complex seizure showed the least response to VNS. No patients were completely without seizures at the six-month follow-up period. In general, the patients were more alert, in a better mood, and better able to concentrate. Two patients had vocal cord paralysis during NCP implantation but gradually recovered vocal function within a few months.
Conclusion: This study in a large HMO, with an integrated delivery system, supports the safety and demonstrates significant efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically refractory epilepsy.

Introduction

Although vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a relatively new therapy for epilepsy, the effects of VNS on brain activity have been studied since the 1930s. More than 80% of cervical vagus nerve fibers are afferent, and these afferent fibers terminate in diffuse areas of the central nervous system after traversing the nucleus of the solitary tract. These afferent fibers project to the cerebellum, hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, medial reticular formation, dorsal raphe, locus ceruleus, nucleus ambiguus, thalamus, insular cortex and other areas of the brain.1-3 Many studies in the biomedical literature2-6 have proposed that the antiepileptic action of VNS is related to effects on the brainstem reticular activating system, which extends to numerous forebrain structures; most studies suggest that the antiepileptic action of VNS is mediated largely by the widespread release of two inhibitory agents, gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine, throughout the brainstem and cerebral cortex.

The antiepileptic effect of VNS has been confirmed in multiple animal models of epilepsy. VNS terminates strychnine-induced seizures in dogs5,6 and inhibits pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures in rats.3,4,7 The observation that VNS used with alumina gel foci reduces frequency of recurrent spontaneous seizures in monkeys8 led to development of a device called the Neurocybernetic Prosthesis (NCP) system, which, in 1988, was first used for clinical trials in humans.9 Since that time, clinical trials in the United States and Europe have studied placement of the NCP system in humans. On July 16, 1997, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of VNS as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures in adults and in adolescents aged 12 years and older.

The Department of Clinical Analysis and the Comprehensive Epilepsy Program of the Southern California Permanente Medical Group have set selection criteria for using VNS to treat refractory epilepsy. In this article, we report our initial postmarketing observations of the safety and efficacy of VNS in a selected group of epileptic patients.

Methods

Epileptic patients were selected for implantation of the NCP system on the basis of four criteria: 1) refractory response to antiepileptic drugs given alone or in various combinations. Patients or family must have recorded at least six seizures per month (four weeks considered as 28 days) in a diary or on a calendar at the time of seizure; diaries are distributed to all patients in the practice at routine neurology visits; diaries for the study patients were reviewed during the six-month postoperative study period; 2) unsuitability as a candidate for epilepsy surgery; 3) no evidence of nonepileptic seizures; and 4) no previous left cervical vagotomy.

Patients who met these selection criteria received routine laboratory tests: complete blood count; levels of serum electrolytes, blood urea creatinine, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, and antiepileptic drugs; prothrombin time; partial thromboplastin time; electrocardiography; and chest x-ray examination. Patients were admitted to the hospital on the morning of the operation. NCP implantation was completed in less than two hours with the patient under general anesthesia.

The NCP system was implanted by our neurosurgeon, who is specially trained in the required surgical technique and procedure. The NCP system consisted of a programmable pulse generator (Cyberonics* Model 100 NCP Pulse Generator), which was implanted in subcutaneous tissue on the upper left side of the chest. The signal from the generator was conducted via a unified lead to a bifurcated stimulating coil electrode (Cyberonics* Model 300 NCP Bipolar Lead); this electrode was applied to the cervical trunk of the left vagus nerve. The generator was tested during the procedure by using a magnetic field induced by a programming wand connected to an IBM-compatible microcomputer. Additional electrodiagnostic examination was also done to measure impedance, to appraise the coupling of all connections, and to verify the overall integrity of the system.

After the operation, patients were monitored in the hospital overnight for any sign of vocal cord dysfunction, dysphagia, respiratory compromise, or seizures. Administration of prophylactic antibiotics began preoperatively and was continued for 24 hours postoperatively. Cervical and chest x-ray films were obtained to confirm proper placement of the device and electrodes before patients were discharged from the hospital.

To allow wound healing, the NCP system was not activated until one week postoperatively. Output current was gradually increased in 0.25 mA increments once per week at six weekly visits to the epilepsy clinic at the medical centers, at six subsequent biweekly visits to the clinic, and then at each of three monthly visits to the clinic. Output current was adjusted on the basis of patients' subjective sensation and tolerance to the electrical stimulation. Maximum output current applied was 3.5 mA. All other VNS parameters were kept constant during the six-month study period. Antiepileptic drug dosages were stable before patients entered the study and were not changed or adjusted during the six-month study period.

Efficacy of VNS was analyzed by calculating mean change in seizure frequency during the last two months (eight weeks considered as 56 days) of the six-month study period and by comparing this mean number with the baseline mean number of seizures in the month (four weeks considered as 28 days) before patients received VNS. We also examined postoperative adverse events, side effects, and tolerability of both the surgical implantation procedure and the NCP device.

The patients who had no mental retardation as part of their clinical syndrome were evaluated with a quality-of-life questionnaire preoperatively and during the postoperative period. We used the standard Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-10)10 to evaluate overall disposition, physical energy, mental concentration, and school work performance. The parents of the patients with mental retardation were asked similar questions about alertness, mood, and behavior of those patients.

Results

Between September 1998 and December 1999, 24 patients (14 male, 10 female) met the selection criteria and received NCP implantation. Ages of patients ranged from 6 years to 70 years (mean age, 27 years). Clinical data for the patients are summarized (Table 1).

Electrical current settings, treatment duration, and effects of VNS on seizure frequency for each patient are summarized (Table 2). The current used for treatment ranged from 1.75 mA to 3.5 mA (median setting, 2.77 mA); duration of activation, 30 seconds; interval between activation sessions, five minutes; duration of pulse, 500 milliseconds; pulse frequency, 30 Hz. In seven patients, VNS began to be effective at the low output current, 0.5 mA. Seven patients had seizure aura; for four (57%) of these patients (patients 4, 5, 12, and 15) activation of NCP by hand-held magnet passing over the implanted generator could abort the seizures at the outset of aura. Fifteen (62.5%) of the 24 patients had more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency; eight of those 15 patients had more than 90% reduction. Nine (37.5%) patients showed no clinically significant benefit.

Among those 24 patients, 14 patients had partial seizures with and without secondarily generalized seizures, and 10 patients had multiple types of generalized seizures. Eight (57.1%) of those 14 patients with partial seizures showed more than 50% reduction of seizure frequency. Seven (70.0%) of those ten patients with multiple type of generalized seizures showed more than 50% reduction of seizure frequency. No patients were completely without seizures at the six-month follow-up period.

We also analyzed six patients who were 12 years old and under; three patients had tuberous sclerosis, two Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and one encephalitis. Five patients (three tuberous sclerosis and two Lennox-Gastaut syndrome) or 83.3% showed more than 50% reduction of seizure frequency.

All side effects were well tolerated and did not precipitate discontinuation of the treatment. Hoarseness developed in two (8.3%) of the 24 patients (patients 4 and 7) because of left vocal cord paralysis. Both patients regained normal voice within three months. Twelve (50%) of the 24 patients had intermittent hoarseness which developed during VNS; other transient events during VNS included paresthesia in the left side of the neck. Vital signs and electrocardiographic findings showed no clinically significant change after VNS.

Among the 13 patients who had no mental retardation, nine patients (patients 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, 14, 15; 16; 23; 69.2%) reported being more alert and better able to concentrate at six-month follow-up; two patients (patients 1 and 5; 15.4%) reported having better mood; and one patient (patient 4; 7.7%) reported having better memory and work performance. The families of nine mentally retarded patients (patients 2, 3, 8, 11, 13, 17, 18, 22, 24) reported that the patients were more mentally alert. Two mentally retarded patients (patients 3 and 8) were reported to have occasional nocturnal wakefulness and required sedation to relieve this symptom.

Discussion

Our study agrees with others11-14 showing that intermittent VNS reduces frequency of seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Some patients started to show the effect of VNS at the low output current of 0.5 mA. High-output current (2.5 mA to 3.5 mA) was associated with greater degree of seizure reduction. In our limited experience, VNS appears to have a broad spectrum of antiepileptic effects on both generalized seizures and partial seizures. The seizure types that respond best to VNS are atonic seizures and complex absence seizures. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures and partial seizures show moderate response to VNS. Separately analyzing patients who are 12 years old and under yields even greater seizure reduction. The reason is that patients in this age group present with multiple types of generalized seizures, particularly atonic seizures and complex absence seizures. Atonic seizures and complex absence seizures are common seizure types in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and tuberous sclerosis. We agree with previous studies14-16 that children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome demonstrated the best response to VNS. This factor may have contributed to better results in our study.

Our study results do not completely support the contention of other studies,17,18 which found that higher baseline frequency of seizures predicts a more favorable response to VNS.

 
Practice Tips
 

Consider vagus nerve stimulation in patients with medically refractory epilepsy with significant impact of their quality of life.

 
In general, the patients were more alert, in a better mood, and better able to concentrate.  
The Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-10) is useful to evaluate adult and adolescent patients overall disposition, physical energy, mental concentration and school work performance.  

Adverse events can occur during NCP implantation and during VNS therapy. One obvious surgical complication of NCP implantation is dysphonia caused by left vocal cord paralysis. The dysphonia gradually disappears in a few months. Direct manipulation of the vagus nerve must be avoided as much as possible to minimize incidence of surgical complications during VNS therapy. Cough and pharyngeal paresthesia commonly occur during initial application of current or when incremental increases of current are too large.

These adverse events can be minimized by postponing VNS therapy until one week after surgery, when the surgical wounds are completely dry. The stimulation should be increased at 0.25 mA increments to avoid adverse effects. Voice alteration occurs in most patients during the stimulation but does not require any lowering of current setting.

VNS appears to be safe and effective as adjunctive treatment for epilepsy. In our comprehensive epilepsy program, we recommend that VNS be limited to patients with epilepsy intractable to most commercially available medications, who are not candidates for epilepsy surgery, and whose epilepsy impacts on their quality of life to such an extent that the risks and the expense of the VNS are justifiable.

 

From the a,b,d-jComprehensive Epilepsy Program, Southern California Permanente Medical Group.

a Dr Chayasirisobhon is Professor of Neurology, Department of Neuroscience and Epilepsy Center, Charles R Drew University of Medicine & Science, Los Angeles, California.

c Professor Parker is Clinical Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California.

* Cyberonics, Houston, Texas.

Acknowledgments

The Medical Editing Department, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, provided editorial assistance. Gloria Acuña, RN, and John Ramirez, BS, clinical specialists from Cyberonics Devices for Epilepsy, Houston, Texas, assisted with technical support during surgery.

References

  1. Ricardo JA, Koh ET. Anatomical evidence of direct projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the hypothalamus, amygdala, and other forebrain structures in the rat. Brain Res 1978;153:1-26.
  2. Rutecki P. Anatomical, physiological, and theoretical basis for the antiepileptic effect of vagus nerve stimulation. Epilepsia 1990;31 Suppl 2:S1-6.
  3. Woodbury DM, Woodbury JW. Effects of vagal stimulation on experimentally induced seizures in rats. Epilepsia 1990;31 Suppl 2:S7-19.
  4. 4. Woodbury JW, Woodbury DM. Vagal stimulation reduces the severity of maximal electroshock seizures in intact rats: use of a cuff electrode for stimulating and recording. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14:94-107.
  5. Zabara J. Inhibition of experimental seizures in canines by repetitive vagal stimulation. Epilepsia 1992;33:1005-12.
  6. Zanchetti A, Wang SC, Moruzzi G. The effect of vagal afferent stimulation on the EEG pattern of the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1952;4:357-61.
  7. McLachlan RS. Suppression of interictal spikes and seizures by stimulation of the vagus nerve. Epilepsia 1993;34:918-23.
  8. Lockard JS, Congdon WC, DuCharme LL. Feasibility and safety of vagal stimulation in monkey model. Epilepsia 1990;31 Suppl 2:S20-6.
  9. Penry JK, Dean JC. Prevention of intractable partial seizures by intermittent vagal stimulation in humans: preliminary results. Epilepsia 1990;31 Suppl 2:S40-3.
  10. Cramer J. Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory: QOLIE-10. Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10: Professional Postgraduate Services; 1993. Attn: QOLIE Study Services, 400 Plaza Drive, Secaucus, NJ 07094.
  11. George R, Salinsky M, Kuzniecky R, et al. First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 3. Long-term follow-up on first 67 patients exiting a controlled study. Epilepsia 1994;35:637-43.
  12. The Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of chronic vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of medically intractable seizures. Neurology 1995;45:224-30.
  13. Salinsky MC, Uthman BM, Ristanovic RK, Wernicke JF, Tarver WB. Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable seizures: results of a one-year open-extension trial. Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group. Arch Neurol 1996;53:1176-80.
  14. Hornig GW, Murphy JV, Schallert G, Tilton C. Left vagus nerve stimulation in children with refractory epilepsy: an update. South Med J 1997;90:484-8.
  15. Murphy JV, Hornig G, Schallert G. Left vagal nerve stimulation in children with refractory epilepsy: preliminary observations. Arch Neurol 1995;52:886-9.
  16. Patwardhan RV, Stong B, Bebin EM, Mathisen J, Grabb PA. Efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with medically refractory epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2000;47:1353-7; discussion 1357-8.
  17. DeGiorgio C, Handforth A, Schachter S, et al. US EOS Study Group. Multicenter, double blind, controlled trial of vagus nerve stimulation (NCP System) for medically intractable partial-onset seizures: initial report of the United States EO5 Study Group [abstract G12]. Epilepsia 1997;38 Suppl 8:133.
  18. Handforth A, DeGiorgio CM, Schachter SC, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for partial-onset seizures: a randomized active-control trial. Neurology 1998;51:48-55.

Correspondence
Sirichai Chayasirisobhon, MD, Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 411 North Lakeview Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807-3089. Phone: 714-279-5401; FAX: 714-279-4890; E-mail: chayasiris@kp.org.

 


To Clinical Contributions index >>
| To next Clinical Contributions article >>

 


Home | The Journal | Subscribe | For Authors | CME | Announcements | Links | Staff | Contact Us


The Permanente Journal

500 NE Multnomah St., Suite 100,
Portland, OR 97232
503-813-4387 / fax: 503-813-2348


Copyright The Permanente Journal, Kaiser Permanente. All rights reserved