![]() |
|
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Fall 2002/Vol. 6, No. 4 |
|
|
Clinical Contributions The
Herbal Medicine Pharmacy Update
Introduction The continued use of herbal medicine in the United States and among members of Kaiser Permanente (KP) makes an updated review of this topic timely and important. Many pharmacies at KP facilities in Southern California now carry traditional herbal preparations. These "dietary supplements" are over-the-counter therapy that is not routinely screened for drug interaction by the pharmacy team. This article discusses herbal medicine with the interests of the physician in mind by emphasizing the importance of understanding the risks and benefits of herbal treatment. We use the skills taught to us by Eddy1-4 to determine if selected herbal medicines pass the evidence-based-medicine test. We discuss selected examples of herbal medicine that have the potential to harm patients. The discussion is not intended to be a complete review of all aspects of herbal remedies. Use of Herbal Therapy in the United States Alternative forms of therapy are defined as intervention neither taught widely in US medical schools nor widely available in US hospitals.5,6 A 1997 national survey showed that 42% of Americans used some form of alternative medicine,5,6 but that figure may be higher for young, affluent, educated populations.7 Eisenberg5 reported that in the US general population, use of over-the-counter herbal medicine increased from 2.5% in 1990 to 12.1% in 1997, and consultation with alternative medicine providers increased from 10.2% in 1990 to 15.1% in 1997. The estimated total retail cost of herbal medicine in the United States is about $4 to $5 billion per year8 and is primarily paid by the people seeking herbal medicine treatment.5 Little was known about prevalence of the use of alternative and herbal medicine by older adults--the largest consumers of health care--until survey results were published by Foster in 2000.9 Thirty percent of the people surveyed who were aged 65 years or more reported using alternative medicine, usually chiropractic services and herbs. By extrapolation, about three million people aged 65 or more used herbal therapy in 1997, and two million used herbal therapy and prescription medication at the same time.9 Physicians are becoming aware of the potential benefit of some herbal medicines and are using them to treat conditions common in our elderly population. Fiftyfive percent of Alzheimer patient caregivers reported that they had tried at least one alternative therapy to improve the patient's memory,10 and 29% of older patients with arthritis reported seeing an alternative medicine provider for their arthritis.11 However, In 1997, Eisenberg reported that 57% of those aged 65 years or more did not disclose use of any alternative medicine to their physician.6 These data suggest that physicians should ask all patients, including high-risk patients such as the elderly, about their use of herbal medicine. Adverse Effects and Drug-Herb Interaction Patients taking prescription drugs and therapeutic herbs may be at risk for adverse drug-herb interactions, including interaction that alters bioavailability and efficacy of the prescription drugs.12 Drug interaction and adverse effects from herbal medicines are more likely to occur among patients who have chronic medical conditions, such as liver, heart, or kidney disease. Older patients have more comorbid illnesses and may be more susceptible to complications caused by herbal medicines.9,12,13 KP pharmacists routinely report potential drug interaction and adverse affects to patients and physicians. However, herbal medicine is not routinely included in these reports, because this information is not routinely programmed into our computer data systems.
Tenuous Position of Herbal Medicines in Evidence-Based Medicine That we practice evidence-based medicine means that we base our decisions on evidence of benefit. If a therapy has sufficient evidence of benefit, we should recommend it to our members; if insufficient evidence of benefit exists or if evidence indicates that the therapy will harm patients, we should not recommend the treatment. Our goals as physicians are to provide treatment that makes our patients better and to protect our patients from treatment that may cause harm. In addition, we do not want to waste members' money. Because herbal products in the United States are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as drugs used to help treat diseases, these products do not undergo premarketing safety and efficacy studies and are not manufactured in a standard way. Herbal medicines are defined by the Dietary Health and Education Act of 1994 as dietary supplements,14 and they are presumed safe until new information shows otherwise. Companies manufacturing herbal medicine can make structure and function claims without support of scientific research, although the claims must be truthful and not misleading. Because herbs cannot be patented, no incentive exists for pharmaceutical companies to invest in research. The FDA would have to prove that an herb was harmful before taking it off the market; however, the FDA has no authority to test herbs. From a quality control perspective, many are concerned about reported observations that herbal preparations are contaminated with pesticides,15 heavy metals,16 microorganisms,17 and conventional medication (acetaminophen, hydrochlorothiazide, indomethacin, phenobarbital, theophylline, and corticosteroids).18 This is just one of the reasons that pregnant women should not use herbal medicines. In addition, many herbal products do not contain what is written on the label. The reference standard for testing efficacy of any therapy is the randomized clinical trial (RCT). Since The Permanente Journal last published a review of herbal medicine,19 more RCTs and meta-analyses of RCTs on herbal medicine have been published. We used these data to help determine whether or not selected categories of herbal medicine constitute evidence-based therapy. Tables 1 and 2 show the results of RCTs, meta-analyses of RCTs, and case reports for a variety of herbal medicines. For a more complete review of this topic, please see the Ernst and Pittler article titled "Herbal Medicine."15 Table 1 lists herbal medicine that passes the evidence-based-medicine test. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs show that some herbs may be efficacious for treating symptoms of certain diseases, such as ginkgo for dementia20 and intermittent claudication,21 horse chestnut extract for chronic venous insufficiency,22 kava for anxiety,23 and St John's wort for depression.24 However, before starting these forms of herbal medicine, consumers and their physicians should review the consumer report on the herb posted on the Internet at consumerlab.com25 and other resources for information. For example, a recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests that St John's wort may lack efficacy for treatment of moderately severe depression.26 Table 2 lists herbal medicine forms that are not supported by RCTs, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses of RCTs as efficacious treatment for certain diseases. These medications should not be part of our treatment regimens.
Herbs That May Harm Patients Table 3 lists types of herbal medicine that may be harmful as described in RCTs, meta-analyses of RCTs, and case reports. These herbs should not be used or should be used only with extreme caution. For instance, licorice has mineralocorticoid properties and has been reported to cause hypokalemia in some patients.44 Hepatitis has been reported in patients taking comfrey, chaparral, or celandine and should not be used by patients with liver disease or who are taking medication that may affect liver function.36,37 Other herbal medicine forms, such as ginger, ginseng, feverfew, devil's claw, and donq quai, can interact with warfarin sodium and may affect platelet function and bleeding times. This type of herbal medication should not be taken by patients already taking anticoagulant medication such as aspirin, warfarin sodium, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Patients scheduled to receive any procedure that may cause bleeding should be asked if they are taking herbal medicine and should be instructed to stop taking herbs which have anticoagulant properties for two weeks before receiving the procedure.38-43 Several recent publications report on renal failure caused by Chinese herbs.44-53 Other recent reports indicate that taking St John's wort can result in lower cyclosporin levels, which have been associated with transplant rejection.54-59 Both of these findings are explained in more detail in the following sections. For a more complete list of herbs that may have serious adverse effects, please refer to the complete German Commission E Monographs, Therapeutic Guide to Herbal Medicines (English translation) published in 1998.34 Chinese Herbs Nephropathy St John's Wort and Acute
Organ Transplant Rejection Herb Information Resources ConsumerLab.com, LLC (www.consumerlab.com) provides independent test results to help consumers and health care providers evaluate nutrition products.25 This resource should be reviewed by physicians as well as by consumers, although the Web site may not be free and may require subscription for some users. For example, a search of the ConsumerLab.com Web site in preparation for this article yielded a report on ginseng19 which showed that of the 21 ginseng products tested, seven contained less than the acceptable amounts of ginsenocide (active ingredient for ginseng), two had levels of pesticides 20 times more than allowed levels, and two contained more than the acceptable level of lead. Physicians need to be aware of potential risks of using herbal medicine and are encouraged to visit www.consumerlab.com and review the information on herbal products before recommending any herbal medicine to patients. To keep the FDA apprised of the real risks of using herbs, physicians can report adverse effects of any herbal medicine to FDA MedWatch on the Internet at www.fda.gov/medwatch.14
Conclusions This article describes selected forms of herbal medication that have some evidence that they help to treat certain disease conditions, some herbs that have no evidence of benefit, and some herbs that are known to cause harm. Most of these conditions can also be treated with conventional medication. As a result of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994,14 manufacturing of herbal extracts is not submitted to the type of quality control used for manufacturing conventional medication; nor is premarketing safety and efficacy research required. Not all herbal preparations are safe, not all herbal products are standardized to particular levels of the active ingredient, and herbal products may contain contaminants such as pesticides and heavy metals. Because of the possibility of adverse effects from herbal medication and of drug-herb interaction, physicians need to obtain a detailed history about the use of over-the-counter medication in all patients. Herbs should not be used by pregnant women and may be harmful to high-risk groups, particularly the elderly. Herbal medication can cause severe adverse effects, such as bleeding complications, nephropathy, and transplant rejection. The use of most herbal medicine is not evidence-based, and the risk clearly outweighs the benefit. Consumers and clinicians need to become familiar with the potential risk and benefit of herbal medication,60 and one good information resource is on the Internet at www.consumerlab.com.25 As health care providers, we should be leaders in asking our patients about herbal medicine use and counseling patients about any interaction herbal medicine may have with prescribed medication.61 In addition, physicians are encouraged to report adverse reactions to herbal medicine to the FDA MedWatch on the Internet at www.fda.gov/medwatch.14 Sponsoring legislation should be considered in order to require that herbal medicine be subjected to the same stringent premarketing scrutiny and controls as conventional drugs. Pharmacist should be aware of herb-drug interaction, and our pharmacy and clinical information systems should be programmed to include information about herbal medicine and interaction profile screening.
References
|
|
|
|