The Permanente Journal

Search the Journal 
  Site Index
TPJ Home pageBrowse The JournalSubscribe to TPJInstructions for AuthorsContinuing Medical EducationAnnouncementsLinksJournal StaffEmail Us


••Fall 2006/Vol. 10, No. 3



Editorial ComentsLetters to the editorAbstracts from articles published in other journalsClinical articles on the practice of Permanente medicineCommentaryMedicine around the worldFuture of medicineKP in the communityArticles from a Systems perspectiveCulturally Compentent CareHealth PolicyPoetry, Art, Musings from Permanente clinicians
Permanente in the newsBook Reviews
Crossword puzzle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Abstracts



Abstracts from the HMO Research Network
11th Annual HMO Research Network Conference

| to pdf >>


 

With this issue we include abstracts from the 2005 11th Annual HMO Research Network Conference, held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, that focused on "Translating Research into Practice."

 

 

From KP Northern California, KP Northwest, KP Southern California:
Physician and patient perspectives on clinician-patient communication during clinic visits: Do you see what I see?
Sung SH, Price M, Tallman K, Janisse T, Frankel R, Gascay D, Godfrey T, Huberman A, Hsu J.

background: Despite its importance in forming clinical relationships, there is limited information on how patients and physicians perceive their own communication during outpatient visits. We examined physician and patient perspectives on physician skills and behaviors during actual outpatient visits.
methods: Using facilitated individual reviews, we asked primary care physicians (n = 15) and two of their regularly scheduled patients (n = 30) to watch videotapes of their own visit and identify significant communication skills or behaviors. Using content analysis, two coders independently categorized the comments into themes, using transcripts of the facilitated reviews. The coders agreed on 70% of the coding categories; a third coder resolved any discrepant response codes. We compared the frequency of themes noted by physicians and patients.
results: Subjects made 904 total comments (mean = 15.1 per visit; 17.1 physician and 13.0 patient comments), which were categorized into 18 themes. The most prevalent themes identified by both physicians and patients were: physician explanation skills (58.3%) and listening skills (55.0%). One physician stated, "I think one thing that is important is to give people information as you go ... people are very anxious about the physical ... let them know it's normal or what you find and what it means. Because at the end, you may forget to mention it or it may be just too much information [to discuss all at once]." Compared with patients, more physicians focused on communication skills to improve visit/time management, while more patients focused on the importance of physician attitudes toward communication (93% vs 20% and 0% vs 47% for physicians and patients respectively).
conclusions: The facilitated review approach could help identify useful communication skills and opportunities from both physician and patient perspectives. These preliminary finding also suggest some discrepancies exist in the two perspectives, such as physician attitudes. Additional research is needed to better understand how physicians and patients view clinical communication.

 


From National Cancer Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Henry Ford Health System, KP Northern California, KP Southern California, KP Northwest, KP Hawaii, KP Colorado, University of Massachusetts Medical School, and Cancer Research and Biostatistics:
Secondary prevention: Priorities in breast cancer screening; recruitment, detection, or follow-up?
Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Yood MU, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmann S, Gilbert J, Mouchawar J, Leyden WA, Altaras R, Beverly RK, Casso D, Westbrook EO, Bischoff K, Zapka JG, Barlow WE.

background: Despite high screening rates within seven integrated health plans, 17% of invasive cancers are late-stage. But, screening is a process not just a test. To set priorities regarding how to further reduce late-stage disease, it is important to understand whether and where the screening process broke down within these plans.
methods: We conducted retrospective reviews of chart and automated data for three years prior to diagnoses of late-stage (metastatic and/or tumor size >3 cm)(cases) and early-stage breast cancers (controls) in 1995-1999 among an identifiable population of >8.2 million people. We categorized their first screening mammogram in the 13-36 months prior to diagnosis as 1) none (absence of screening), 2) negative (absence of detection) or 3) positive (potential breakdown in follow-up). We compared the proportion (two-sided test) of cases and controls and estimated the likelihood of late-stage as a function of race and refusal-of-breast-care. Among late-stage cases, we evaluated demographic characteristics associated with absence of screening.
results: The distributions of absence of screening, absence of detection, and potential breakdown in follow-up differed among case (52.1%, 39.5%, and 8.4%, respectively) and control (34.4%, 56.9%, and 8.8%, respectively) subjects (p = .03). Among all women, the odds of having late-stage cancer were higher among women with an "absence of screening" (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.84 to 2.56; p < .001) or who refused care prior to the study period (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 2.11 to 4.73). Among late-stage disease subjects, women were more likely to be in the absence of screening group if they were aged 75 years or older (OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 2.10 to 3.65), unmarried (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.41 to 2.24), or without a family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.45-2.34). A higher proportion of women from census blocks with less than a 50% likelihood of a college education (58.5% versus 49.4%; p + 0.003), or an annual income of less than $75,000 (54.4% versus 42.9%; p = 0.004) were in the absence of screening category compared to all other categories combined.
conclusions: To further reduce late-stage breast cancer occurrence, top priority for screening implementation should be given to reaching unscreened women, including those who are older, unmarried, low income, and less educated.

 


From KP Colorado:
Rehabilitation characteristics in community-dwelling, nonagenarian patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities.
Conner DA, Barnes C.

background: The distinction of "65 years of age and older" is increasingly recognized as an artificial one. Geriatric researchers are beginning to recognize distinct groups of older adults. We examined rehabilitation characteristics of community-dwelling HMO nonagenarian members (90 years of age and older) who received rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities.
methods: Retrospective analysis of the records of 928 community-dwelling HMO members 90 years of age and older, admitted to one of seven skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation following a hospitalization or decline in function. Measures included admission motor and cognitive FIM, days post onset, medical complexity, age, gender, therapy hours, days of therapy, and total FIM gain at discharge. Logistic regression determined significant predictors of the proportion of patients discharged to the community (home, board and care, or an assisted-living facility), and adequate rehabilitation progress defined as a gain of one or more FIM points per day.
results: Average age was 92.8 years (range: aged 90-to-107 years). Average SNF length of stay was 10.9 days. Sixty-three percent of patients were discharged to a community setting. Patients discharged to the community were admitted with significantly greater total FIM, cognitive FIM, and motor FIM, as well as fewer days post onset and lower medical complexity. Admission motor and cognitive FIM were significant predictors of discharge to the community. Patients achieving adequate rehabilitation progress were admitted with significantly greater total FIM, cognitive FIM, and motor FIM, and lower medical complexity. Predictors of adequate progress included admission cognitive FIM, admission motor FIM, and days post onset.
conclusions: More than 60% of patients, 90 years old and older, were discharged to a community setting following rehabilitation. Admission cognitive and motor FIM, medical complexity, and days post onset are important measures influencing rehabilitation outcomes in this older population.

 


From HealthPartners:
The impact of comorbid depression on CHD in the elderly: Health status and clinical outcomes.
Whitebird RR, Rush WA, O'Connor PJ, Asche SE, Solberg LI, Rush MM.

background: Depression has been established as a significant risk factor for patients with chronic heart disease (CHD) with growing interest focused not only on quality-of-life concerns, but on the effects depression may have on important clinical and health status factors. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the impact of depression on important clinical and health status measures in older adults with CHD.
methods: Data are from a four-year multisite collaborative study that used a combination of survey, chart audit, and administrative data to examine improvement strategies that lead to best care practices for patients with chronic disease including CHD. Depression was assessed using the PHQ2 to identify the cardinal signs of depression. Logistic and multiple regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between depression and clinical measures including blood pressure, LDL lipid measurement and perceived health status measures.
results: Depression was not significantly related to clinical outcomes of LDL, SBP, or DPB, but was significantly related to poorer perceived health status measures including decreased physical health (p < .001) and physical activity (p < .001), increased arthritis (p < .0001), and poorer patient assessment of their primary health care (p < .004). Depression was also significantly related to lower psychosocial functioning including lower perceived social support (p < .0001) and strongly held beliefs that CHD is a future threat and currently causing problems in their life (p < .0001).
conclusions: These findings suggest that depression has significant implications for physical and psychosocial health and should be assessed and monitored in providing care for elderly patients with CHD.

 

 

 

To Fall 2006 Contents >>

 

 


Home | The Journal | Subscribe | For Authors | CME | Announcements | Links | Staff | Contact Us


The Permanente Journal

500 NE Multnomah St., Suite 100,
Portland, OR 97232
503-813-3286 / fax: 503-813-2348


Copyright The Permanente Journal, Kaiser Permanente. All rights reserved