The Permanente Journal

Search the Journal 
  Site Index
TPJ Home pageBrowse The JournalSubscribe to TPJInstructions for AuthorsContinuing Medical EducationAnnouncementsLinksJournal StaffEmail Us


••Fall 1998 / Vol 2, No 4

Comments from the Journal EditorsAbstracts from articles published in other journals
Clinical articles on the practice of Permanente medicineClinical articles on the practice of Permanente medicine
Poetry, Art, Musings from Permanente clinicians
Nonclinical articles on external issuesFrom the Medical DirectorsArticles from a Systems perspective
Book Reviews lighter side of medicine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinical Contributions



Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Needle Biopsy | to pdf >>
By Jeffrey Pollen, MD; Daniel Smiley, MD

Introduction
Intensive screening for prostate cancer has led to a phenomenal increase in the number of biopsies done. To determine incidence of febrile reactions and to identify the most effective prophylaxis against fever after prostatic cancer biopsy, we reviewed the medical records of patients who had transrectal prostatic needle biopsy.

Method
We reviewed 172 consecutive records of patients who had transrectal prostatic needle biopsy during a three-month period in a health maintenance organization. We recorded the prophylactic regimens and incidence of febrile reaction, defined as temperature >101° F accompanied by shaking chills, with or without urinary infection symptoms.

Results
Patients had transrectal prostatic needle biopsy because of a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer or because of elevated serum levels of prostate-specific antigen. Procedures were done in the clinic without anesthesia or sedation and used an 18-gauge spring-loaded needle (Microvasive®, Boston Scientific Corporation, Watertown, Mass). Bowel preparation consisted of a phosphate enema given on the morning before biopsy. Some patients received an additional enema the night before biopsy.

The number of digitally directed and ultrasound-guided procedures were nearly equally distributed. A mean of three to four biopsies were taken (range, one to eight).

Prophylaxis
As preparation for biopsy, group A (102 patients) did not receive ciprofloxacin. Fourteen of these patients received a povidone-iodine enema, intramuscular administration of gentamicin, and oral administration of either trimethoprim (TMP) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in single doses perioperatively. In 88 patients, the povidone-iodine enema was omitted. These patients received gentamicin alone preoperatively or gentamicin and either TMP or TMP-SMX in single doses. A small number of patients continued to receive TMP-SMX for three to five days.

In group B (45 patients), ciprofloxacin was added to the prophylactic regimen, postoperatively. Of these patients, 28 were given gentamicin preoperatively and ciprofloxacin, 500 mg every 12 hours for three days postoperatively. Seventeen patients received gentamicin, TMP, and metronidazole in single doses perioperatively and ciprofloxacin, 500 mg every 12 hours for two days postoperatively.

Group C (25 patients) started ciprofloxacin prophylaxis preoperatively. Ciprofloxacin, 500 mg, was given every 12 hours for three or four doses, starting the night before the biopsy. No other antibiotics were given.

Fever
Febrile reactions developed in 13 (7.6%) of the patients, 1 usually within one to three days after biopsy (Table 1). There was no correlation of fever with number of biopsy cores. Fever developed in 11 (10.8%) of the group A patients and in two (4.5%) of the group B patients. Fever was not seen in group C patients, who started ciprofloxacin prophylaxis prior to biopsy.

Discussion
Urosepsisusually caused by E. coliis the most feared complication of transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. Fever may be expected to develop in about 23% of patients who do not receive prophylactic antibiotics (range, 6% to 48%).1,2 Febrile reactions as low as 1.4% to 2.9% have been reported in patients who receive ultrasound-guided biopsy without the benefit of antibiotics.3,4 Nonetheless, most centers would recommend prophylactic antibiotics.5 Introduction of nonquinolone antibiotics can lower the frequency of febrile reactions to about 12% (range, 0 to 24%).6,7 Prophylaxis using quinolones can reduce febrile complications to about 3.2% (range, 0-3.9%).8,9,10 Ciprofloxacin diffuses readily into the prostate. After initially high serum levels, orally administered ciprofloxacin concentrates in the prostate during a 12- to 24-hour period.11 Maximal protection against febrile reactions can be realized when quinolone prophylaxis is begun one to 12 hours before transrectal biopsy is done.8,9 Although pretreatment with antibiotics is largely responsible for the reduced complication rate, coverage must be continued for 12 hours to seven days after biopsy.9,12 The value of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was underscored by a recent report of 4439 biopsies. Of patients treated with 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice daily for eight doses (beginning with three doses before biopsy), febrile E. coli infections developed in 0.07%.13 Povidone-iodine solution administered rectally can reduce infectious complications,7,14,15 but its use was discontinued in our clinic after vasovagal reactions developed in some patients. Although our findings were not statistically significant, they support use of quinolones to prevent fever due to transrectal prostatic needle biopsy. Compared with other prophylactic regimens, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis substantially lowered the incidence of fever, especially when started preoperatively. Our current protocol calls for ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (500 mg every 12 hours for four doses) starting on the night before biopsy and self-administration of phosphate enema on the morning of biopsy. Patients are encouraged to minimize consumption of liquids to maximize the concentration of antimicrobial agent in tissue and urine. This regimen has reduced the incidence of fever to <2%.

Conclusion
Ciprofloxacin given before and after transrectal prostatic needle biopsy may prevent febrile complications. Physicians who have not yet done so might consider a similar cost-effective policy.

Related material presented as a poster at the 13th World Congress on Endourology and SWL 11th Basic Research Symposium, Jerusalem, Israel, November 26-December 1, 1995, and published in J Endourol 1995 Nov;9 Suppl 1:S147.

Reprint requests: Jeffrey Pollen, MD, Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, 4647 Zion Avenue, San Diego, CA 92120-5397. Phone: (619) 528-5458; FAX: (619) 528-5940.


References
1. Gustaffson O, Norming U, Nyman CR, Öhström M. Complications following combined transrectal aspiration and core biopsy of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1990;24:249-51.
2. Crawford ED, Haynes AL Jr, Story MW, Borden TA. Prevention of urinary tract infection and sepsis following transrectal prostatic biopsy. J Urol 1982;127:449-51.
3. Torp-Pedersen S, Lee F, Littrup PJ, Siders DB, Kumasaka GH, Solomon MH, et al. Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided with transrectal US: longitudinal and multiplanar scanning. Radiology 1989;170(1 Pt 1):23-7.
4. Enlund A-L, Varenhorst E. Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy: a prospective study in 415 cases. Br J Urol 1997;79:777-80.
5. Turner BI, Warner JJ, Rhamy RK. Prostatic needle examination: current clinical concepts. South Med J 1980;73:183-4.
6. Fong IW, Struthers N, Honey RJ, Simbul M, Boisseau DA. A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus netilmicin-metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy. J Urol 1991;146:794-7.
7. Brown RW, Warner JJ, Turner BI, Harris LF, Alford RH. Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal prostatic biopsy. Urology 1981;18:145-8.
8. Roach MB, Figueroa TE, McBride D, George WJ, Neal DE Jr. Ciprofloxacin versus gentamicin in prophylaxis against bacteremia in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Urology 1991;38:84-7.
9. Norberg M, Holmberg L, Häggman M, Magnusson A. Determinants of complications after multiple transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. Eur Radiol 1996;6:457-61.
10. Aus G, Ahlgren G, Bergdahl S, Hugosson J. Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate: risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br J Urol 1996;77:851-5.
11. Dalhoff A, Weidner W. Diffusion of ciprofloxacin into prostatic fluid. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1984;3:360-2.
12. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV. Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993;71:457-9.
13. Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Agusta VE, Breslin JA, Huffnagle HW, Harpster LE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J Urol 1997;157:2199-200.
14. Melekos MD. Efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in preventing infectious complications after transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol 1990:22;257-62.
15. Rees M, Ashby EC, Pocock RD, Dowding CH. Povidone-iodine antisepsis for transrectal prostatic biopsy. Br Med J 1980;281:650.

To Fall 1998 Table of Contents >>

 



The Permanente Journal

500 NE Multnomah St., Suite 100,
Portland, OR 97232
503-813-3286 / fax: 503-813-2348


Copyright The Permanente Journal, Kaiser Permanente. All rights reserved