The Permanente Journal

Search the Journal 
  Site Index
TPJ Home pageBrowse The JournalSubscribe to TPJInstructions for AuthorsContinuing Medical EducationAnnouncementsLinksJournal StaffEmail Us


••Spring 2007/Vol. 11, No. 2


A Focus on the Electronic Medical Record

Original articlesClinical articlesReview ArticlesCase StudiesEditorial ComentsCommentaryAbstracts from articles published in other journalsPoetry, Art, Musings from Permanente clinicians
Book Reviews

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Abstracts


 

12th Annual HMO Research Network Conference
Abstracts from the HMO Research Network

With this issue we include abstracts from the 2006 12th Annual HMO Research Network Conference, held in Boston, Massachusetts, which focused on "Optimizing Practice Through Interdisciplinary Research."

From Institute on Multicultural Health, Henry Ford Health System, Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan
Preliminary findings from a longitudinal examination of depression and diabetes outcomes among African Americans.
Lipton B, Perkins DW, Williams VH, Aikens JE.

background: Previous research demonstrates that both depression and African-American race are associated with poor diabetes mellitus (DM)-related outcomes. In addition, African Americans have been vastly underrepresented in studies of diabetes-depression comorbidity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate associations between depression and diabetes outcomes in a racially balanced sample of participants.
methods: The data for this analysis were drawn from baseline of a longitudinal study of depression in diabetes being conducted within a large urban health care system. African-American and Caucasian primary care patients, 18 years of age with Type 2 DM, were eligible to participate. Recruitment letters were sent to potentially eligible patients, followed by telephone screening and informed consent. Participants completed a measure of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire ­ 9 [PHQ-9]) along with other self-report measures assessing diabetes self-care patterns, treatment perceptions, and diabetes-related quality of life. Glycemic control was assessed using HbA1c assays. Data were analyzed by frequency analysis, student's t-test, and multiple regression analysis.
results: Between January 2005 and December 2005, 208 participants were enrolled (57% African American and 43% Caucasian; 55% male). Mean (± SD) participant age was 56.0 ± 8.8 years and mean HbA1c was 7.6% ± 1.7 (slightly higher than the reference range). Using PHQ-9 guidelines, 18.3% of participants were classifiable as having probable depressive disorder, which was not significantly associated with ethnicity. However, compared to Caucasians, African Americans reported significantly more barriers to glucose self-testing (p < .01), reported significantly more negative illness perceptions (p < .05), and demonstrated significantly poorer glycemic control (p < .05).
conclusions: Compared to Caucasians with diabetes, African Americans with diabetes experience more barriers to blood glucose testing, view themselves as having more severe diabetes, and demonstrate poorer glycemic control. These findings imply that efforts to improve African-Americans' diabetes outcomes should be culturally tailored, and should address barriers to glucose testing as well as negative perceptions of having diabetes. Although the study is limited by its cross-sectional design, future studies of its longitudinal extension will consider how depression and self-care behaviors interact over a six-month period to impact long-term outcomes.

 


From Group Health Center for Health Studies, Group Health Community Foundation
Identifying the barriers to optimal healing in primary care.
Hawkes RJ, Sherman KJ, Wiese CJ, Hsu CW, Cherkin DC.

background: The current method of reimbursement for physician services encourages a focus on the procedural and technical aspect of medicine and discourages development of skills necessary to provide truly patient-centered care. These emphases on prescriptive services coupled with increased patient loads and diminished resources have left many primary care providers exhausted and dispirited. Beleaguered clinicians are unlikely to cultivate effective healing relationships with patients. In order to restore healing to health care, clinicians will need to reconnect with patients and their passion for the art of medicine. This study attempts to elucidate the barriers to more effective healing from the perspectives of both patients and providers.
methods:
Focus groups were conducted with Group Health Cooperative Physicians (MDs), Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) and Medical Assistants (MAs) working in primary care clinics in western Washington and with patients who had utilized primary care. Focus groups lasted two hours and were conducted with 23 MDs, 44 nursing staff (RNs, LPNs, and MAs) and 28 patients. The proceedings were recorded and transcribed. The ethnographic software, ATLAS.ti, is being used to analyze the data.
results:
Preliminary results indicate that both patients and primary care team members have a broad view of healing that includes emotional, spiritual, and physical aspects. Providers and patients view time as an important barrier to providing healing care and providers believe that major changes that have occurred in recent years have exacerbated their stress levels. Many providers noted that the inefficient functioning of primary care teams contributed to both patient and provider dissatisfaction. Finally, providers often commented that for meaningful change to occur, it is important to empower local teams to identify ways to improve the care they provide.
conclusions: Primary care is in crisis and transformative changes will be necessary if primary care is to survive as a viable professional role and as the foundation of rational health care systems. This study elucidates the barriers that will need to be overcome if primary care providers are to reconnect with their original passions for medicine and healing and to be able to provide care that is truly healing.

 


From Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, MA; Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada; Masonicare, Wallingford, CG; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
Effect of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support on adverse drug events in the long-term care setting.
Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Rochon P, Judge JJ, Harrold LR, Lee M, White K, LaPrino J, Erramuspe-Mainard J, DeFlorio M, Gavendo L, Bell C, Bates DW.

background: Adverse drug events (ADEs) occur frequently among nursing home residents, and preventable events are most commonly associated with errors in drug ordering and monitoring. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support for preventing ADEs in the long-term setting.
methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial in two large long-term care facilities for up to one year. Resident care units of the two facilities were randomized to computerized physician order entry with and without clinical decision support. Computer alerts included warnings to reconsider specific drug orders, recommendations for laboratory monitoring, and alerts to monitor closely for selected drug side effects. On the intervention units, the alert messages were displayed in a pop-up box to prescribers in real-time when a drug order was entered. We assessed the numbers and rates of adverse drug events, as well as preventability.
results:
The overall rate of ADEs was 10.8 per 100 resident-months in the intervention units and 10.4 in the control unites (rate ratio = 1.04; 95% CI 0.89-1.29). The rate of preventable ADEs was 4.0 per 100 resident-months in the intervention units and 3.9 in the control units (rate ratio = 1.03; 95% CI 0.81-1.32).
conclusions: Use of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support was not found to reduce the occurrence of preventable ADEs in the long-term care setting. Further refinement of computerized clinical decision support systems for use in the long-term care setting is essential in order to enhance the impact on medication safety. Such refinements might include improving the specificity of the alerts to reduce alert burden for prescribers, incorporating additional alerts into the clinical decision support system to address a broader range of ADEs, and integrating more clinical and laboratory information into the clinical decision support system.

 


From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR
Clinician awareness of low health literacy.
Vuckovic NH, McMullen C, Schneider J.

background: Literacy is a large and often under-recognized problem in health care delivery in the US. As many as one in every five American are functionally illiterate, and an additional 27% have marginal literacy skills. Health literacy is a term that signifies the skills needed by individuals to understand and carry out medical instructions and preventive care advice. Individuals with low health literacy have difficulty reading and understanding routine health information such as dosage instruction on medication bottles, appointment slips, preprocedure instructions, and consent forms. Low health literacy comprises an individual's ability to understand and carry out medical instructions, and may lead to medication noncompliance, adverse outcomes, increased outpatient utilization, and preventable hospitalizations. Clinicians may have limited understanding of the presence and impact of low health literacy.
methods: We conducted eight focus groups with clinicians and medical assistants at clinics in Kaiser Permanente Northwest. Focus group interviews were taped and transcribed, and content analyzed.
results: Clinicians recognized the negative health impacts that could result from low health literacy, but were largely unable to tell which patients had such difficulties. Barriers to screening for low health literacy included lack of time during the clinic visit and potential discomfort on the part of the patient. Clinicians and medical assistants discussed the lack of utility of such assessments if there were no way to document or respond to positive findings.
conclusions: While clinicians and staff are aware of the negative outcomes of low health literacy, screening for low health literacy is seen as problematic. Systemwide efforts to implement and respond to screening information must be addressed along with developing proper tools to assess low health literacy.


 

 

To Spring 2007 Contents >>

 

 

 


Home | The Journal | Subscribe | For Authors | CME | Announcements | Links | Staff | Contact Us


The Permanente Journal

500 NE Multnomah St., Suite 100,
Portland, OR 97232
503-813-3286 / fax: 503-813-2348


Copyright The Permanente Journal, Kaiser Permanente. All rights reserved