|
  


  

|
 |
 |
Health
Systems
Are
Your Patients Taking What You Prescribe?
A Major Determinant: Clinician-Patient
Communication
By Lee
Jacobs, MD
Making
the Case
Chances
are that many patients you saw today will not do what you suggested
or take what you prescribed!
It
is well established that adherence of patients to prescribed therapy
for a variety of diseases is rarely more than 60%.1 This
includes studies in HIV,2 child and adult asthma,3
diabetes,4 hypertension,5 and post myocardial
infarction (MI) care.6
Taking
medications exactly as prescribed is especially critical in HIV care,
in which patients must take their antiretrovirals 95% of the time to
get complete viral suppression.7 What is considered acceptable
adherence (60%-80%) for other chronic illnesses is certainly not good
enough for HIV.
The Reasons
for Poor Adherence
Why
your patients do what they do ... or why your patients don't do what
you want them to do!
The
many studies of adherence to therapy consistently list various combinations
of the following explanations:8
- Logistic
issues--access to care; transportation.9
- Perceptions
of health benefits from the therapy; concern about side effects.10
-
Social and cultural--including practical and emotional support.11
Beliefs.
- Complexity
of treatment regimens12--eg, number of daily doses; dietary
requirements.
- Patient's
condition: Depression;13 patients over 75 years.14
- Communication
and relationship with health care provider.15,16
It
is probably important to stress that clinicians cannot predict who will
adhere, because there is no definitive characteristic of an adherent
individual. Gender, ethnicity, marital status, personality traits, and
educational level fail to predict adherence.17
It
is also well established that clinician-patient relationship and communication
is the major determinant as to whether the patient will follow the advice
or take the medication prescribed. Examples of study conclusions on
the pivotal role of communication include:
- The
most important factor in predicting adherence is the level of clinician-patient
relationship.18
-
The principal determinant of best health outcomes of asthmatics was
a partnership relationship with a doctor.19
-
Patients only follow recommendations that they really believe in and
those they actually have the ability to carry out.20
-
Clinical therapies do not exist in vitro; they exist in a contextual
environment that includes the patient-clinician relationship; and
this relationship modifies therapeutic effectiveness.21
-
Women who perceived that their physician had some enthusiasm for mammography
were more than 4.5 times more likely to have the procedure done.22
- Over
50% of the patients forgot what the doctor had said five minutes after
the conversation.23
| |
|
| |
Adherence
is the extent to which a person's behavior (medications, diets,
lifestyle changes) coincides with medical or health advice.25
|
|
|
|
Improving
Patient Adherence
It's
not the power of the pen, but rather the power of the ear!
So
what can be done to improve the likelihood that your patient will take
the medicine that you write on the prescription pad? Listen to the patient.
You can use your communication skills to probe each of the variables
implicated as causes for poor adherence. This central role of clinician-patient
communication is demonstrated in the following schematic:
Central
Role of Communication in Adherence
Conclusion
| |
|
| |
Compliance:
Implies patient follows doctor's orders, is less informed, and
has little or no input.
Adherence:
Focuses more on patient commitment to the regimen. Is based on
reasonable negotiations and more patient empowerment than compliance.
Concordance:
Is based on
notion of patient equality and respect for patient autonomy, the
desired relationship in a therapeutic alliance between the care
team and the patient.
|
|
|
|
Finding
solutions to address the alarming high rate of poor adherence has to
become a priority for the health care community. However, very few trials
have been undertaken to study interventions to improve adherence.24
As suggested in this model, it is recommended that future research focus
primarily on team member and clinician communication skills with the
patient that would reveal possible barriers to adherence and result
in a much more effective and truly shared decision.
| Interregional
Clinician-Patient Communication Leadership Group (IRCPC) Mission: |
| The
Mission of the IRCPC is to ensure that excellence in clinician-patient
communication is a distinguishing feature of our members' care experience
throughout Kaiser Permanente, is accepted as a critical aspect of
clinical practice, and is recognized as a major contributor to our
organizational success. |
Acknowledgment
The
author thanks Joan Guilford, MPH, from the Georgia Region's Business
Consulting Group, who assisted with the development of the illustration.
References
-
Sackett DL, Snow JC. The magnitude of compliance and noncompliance.
In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, editors. Compliance in health
care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979. p 11-22.
-
Wu A. Report from Buenos Aires: lessons in adherence. Hopkins HIV
Report 2001 Sep;13(5):9-11.
-
Rand CA. Comprehensive review of the history, contect, issues and
measurement of adherence. In: Asthma Adherence Workshop report. Melbourne
(Victoria): National Asthma Campaign; 1997. p 12-5.
-
Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health
maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster
visits. Diabetes Care 1999 Dec;22(12):2011-7.
-
Berlowitz DR, Ash AS, Hickey EC, et al. Inadequate management of blood
pressure in a hypertensive population. N Eng J Med 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1957-63.
-
Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Berkman L, et al. Treatment adherence and
risk of death after a myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990 Sep 1;336(8714):542-5.
-
Paterson D, Swindells S, Mohr J, et al. How much adherence is enough?
A perspective study of adherence
to protease inhibitor therapy using MEMSCaps [abstract]. 6th Conference
on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, January 31, February
4, 1999, Chicago, IL. Available on the World Wide Web (accessed July
8, 2002): www.thebody.com/confs/retro99/session15.html
-
Elliott WJ, Maddy R, Toto R, Barkris G. Hypertension in patients with
diabetes. Overcoming barriers to effective control. Postgrad Med 2000
Mar;107(3):2932, 35-6, 38.
-
Markson LE, Turner BJ, Cocroft J, Houchens R, Fanning TR. Clinic services
for persons with AIDS. Experience in a high-prevalence state. J Gen
Intern Med 1997 Mar;12(3):141-9.
-
Lin EH, Von Korff M, Katon W, et al. The role of the primary care
physician in patients' adherence to antidepressant therapy. Med Care
1995 Jan;33(1):67-74.
-
Stanton AL. Determinants of adherence to medical regimens by hypertensive
patients. J Behav Med 1987 Aug;10(4):377-94.
-
Gordis L. Conceptual and methodological problems in measuring patient
compliance. In: Haynes RB, Taylor DW, Sackett DL, editors. Compliance
in health care. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979. p
23-45.
-
DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for
noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects
of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000
Jul 24;160(14):2101-7.
-
Shimp LA, Ascione FJ, Glazer HM, Atwood BF. Potential medication-related
problems in noninstitutionalized elderly. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1985
Oct;19(10):766-72.
-
Bartlett EE, Grayson M, Barker R, Levine DM, Golden A, Libber S. The
effects of physician communications skills on patient satisfaction:
recall, and adherence. J Chronic Dis 1984;37(9-10):755-64.
-
Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication:
a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18.
-
Meichenbaum D, Turk DC. Facilitating treatment adherence: a practitioner's
handbook. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.
-
Toelle B, Peat J, Dunn S. A qualitative analysis of patient adherence
with the Australian Asthma Management Plan. Respirology 1998 Oct;3
Suppl:A42.
-
Anderson, J. Patient behaviour and attitudes to asthma. In: Asthma
Adherence Workshop report. Melbourne (Victoria): National Asthma Campaign;
1997. p 51-3.
-
DiMatteo MR. Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations.
JAMA 1994 Jan 5;271(1):79, 83.
-
Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence
of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet
2001 Mar 10;357(9258):757-62.
-
Fox SA, Siu AL, Stein JA. The importance of physician communication
on breast cancer screening of older women. Arch Intern Med 1994 Sep
26;154(18):2058-68.
-
From compliance to concordance: achieving shared goals in medicine
taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and
Merck Sharp & Dohme; 1997. Available on the World Wide Web (accessed
July 9, 2002): www.concordance.org/about/Concordance.pdf.
-
Haynes RB, McDonald H, Garg AX, Montague P. Interventions for helping
patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 2002;(2). Most recent update 26-2-2002.
-
Sackett DL. Introduction. In: Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Compliance with
therapeutic regimens. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1976.
p 1-6.
-
National Asthma Council Australia. Asthma adherence: a guide for health
professionals. South Melbourne (Victoria): The National Asthma Council
Australia; [1999?] Available on the World Wide Web (accessed July
9, 2002): www.nationalasthma.org.au/publications/adherence/index.html
-
Hippocrates. On decorum. In: Jones WH, translator. Hippocrates, with
an English translation. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press;
1923. p 267-301.

To
Health Systems index >> | To
next Health Systems article >>
To
full contents list >>
|
 |
 |
   |