The Permanente Journal

Search the Journal 
  Site Index
TPJ Home pageBrowse The JournalSubscribe to TPJInstructions for AuthorsContinuing Medical EducationAnnouncementsLinksJournal StaffEmail Us


••Winter 2000 / Vol 4, No 1

Comments from the Journal EditorsAbstracts from articles published in other journals
Clinical articles on the practice of Permanente medicine
Poetry, Art, Musings from Permanente clinicians
Nonclinical articles on external issuesArticles from a Systems perspective
Book ReviewsCommentary, articles from Medical Directors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clinical Contributions


 

Improvement in Quality-of-Life Indicators for Patients Suffering from Chronic Pain Syndromes
By Philip J. Tuso, MD, FACP

An Internal Medicine Pain Clinic was started at our facility to help primary care practitioners manage pain associated with chronic, disabling, nonmalignant conditions. This article describes results of a study done to evaluate the success of this clinic in the two years since its inception. By providing a compassionate care environment and by assuring members that their medications would be available on a designated day each month, scores in pain, anxiety, life satisfaction, and mood were improved for most patients.

Introduction
Practicing physicians are concerned about how our profession manages patients who have pain.1,2 Patients with terminal cancer can be referred to a hospice program, which allows patients to die with minimal suffering.3,4 Patients with chronic pain syndromes may be more difficult to treat and may often require narcotic analgesia to manage their pain.5-9 These patients are often depressed, and their reported use of pain medication may differ from actual use.10-13 In some cases, this misreporting becomes a major problem because many physicians are reluctant to refill prescriptions for pain medications without examining the patient.2 Pharmacists know the patients who frequently ask for medication refills and are concerned because of the long-term toxicity associated with medication formulated to include acetaminophen.14,15 Because of complaints by patients, pharmacists, and primary care practitioners, an Internal Medicine Pain Clinic was started at the Kaiser Permanente Antelope Valley Medical Offices to help primary care providers understand the characteristics of these patients and to understand the tools needed that may help in long-term pain management for patients suffering from chronic disabling conditions.

Methods
Health Plan members were selected for inclusion in the study on the basis of being referred by primary care providers and pharmacists to the Internal Medicine Pain Clinic. All patients answered a psychosocial questionnaire at their initial visit and answered life satisfaction surveys at every visit. A social worker met with members individually and in weekly support groups to focus on management of other conditions (eg, dependence on opioid analgesic agents, psychosocial trauma) that may affect patients' perception of pain. Treatment plans included referral for further studies or consultative services (eg, neurology, physical medicine, anesthesiology) when necessary. Patients with nonmalignant medical conditions who were receiving opioid analgesic therapy for chronic pain were promised that they would receive a predetermined quantity of medications at regular (28-day) intervals and were informed of the risks and benefits of this therapy as well as alternatives to it. Antidepressant agents with or without referral to psychiatry or drug addiction medicine specialists were given to patients as indicated.

Before and after their course of treatment at the clinic, patients answered a questionnaire that asked them to rate their subjective experience with the treatment on a scale of one to ten, a score of ten indicating severe pain, anxiety, dissatisfaction with life, and negative mood (Figure 1).

Results
Questionnaires about pain were received from 180 patients who were evaluated in the clinic during the two years since its inception in May 1999. Of those patients who returned for follow-up management, (n = 113), most (69%) were female, and the mean age was 49 years.

Of the patients who filled out questionnaires (n = 180), tobacco use (n = 80) and depression (n = 92) were common characteristics, as were a history of family problems (n = 58) and of divorce (n = 59). Most of these patients had tried physical therapy and pain medication without improvement. Fewer than 20% of the patients had tried acupuncture or other forms of alternative therapy.

The most common causes of pain seen in the clinic were headache (n = 88) and disc disease (n = 135). Some unusual causes of chronic pain treated in the clinic included postherpetic neuralgia, avascular necrosis, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD).

Table 1 presents the mean scores reported by Health Plan members seen in the pain clinic before and after initial treatment (n = 113). Before treatment, mean pain score reported was 6.5, and most patients (68 of 113 respondents) were anxious (reported score greater than or equal to five).

By receiving care in a compassionate environment, most people improved their scores in mood, anxiety, and life satisfaction. A supportive team approach and promising the member that medication would be available at the same time each month reduced patients' overall anxiety levels by 20% (ie, from a mean pretreatment score of 5.4 to a mean posttreatment score of 4.3). For 59% of members, the total score improved after initial treatment; for 41% of members, their condition either did not improve or became worse (Figure 2).

Discussion
Research has shown that subjective pain ratings higher than four on a ten-point scale interfere substantially with a patient's activities and mood.36 However, management of chronic pain is a complicated process that requires the skills of many people, including the patient. Patients in our study were thus encouraged to be aware of the different components of their pain syndrome and to be constantly aware of the long-term side effects of their pain medications.

In our study, mean pretreatment and posttreatment mean pain scores were much higher than four. Despite thorough examination of patients, the team of providers working in the clinic could not substantially improve this pain score. In contrast, mood and anxiety scores improved greatly after treatment and were associated with an overall improvement in patient's life satisfaction. To achieve these improved scores, patients seen in the pain clinic were evaluated carefully in an empathetic environment to determine what part of their perceived pain was caused by physical injury (ie, the body's need for pain medication), psychosocial trauma, or both. These factors are subjective, and effective tools to monitor their role in pain perception have not been developed. Consequently, clinicians who work with patients suffering from chronic nonmalignant pain should tend to believe the scores reported to them by their patients.4

Conclusion
From a patient's perspective, the first goal of treatment is to manage pain. After this has been accomplished, the provider-patient team can work to address psychosocial issues and any addictive behavior that may exist. Patients with a chronic pain syndrome are understandably anxious and need support and encouragement from the primary care practitioners. When this support is provided and the pain is alleviated, patients can begin the process of improving their overall quality of life. v


References:
1.Caudal MA, Hollman GH, Turk D. Effective ways to manage chronic pain. Patient Care 1996 June 15;30:154-72.
2.Medical Board of California. Business & Professional Code. Action report, July, 1994.
3.Glajchen M, Fitzmartin RD, Blum D, Swanton R. Psychological barriers to cancer pain relief. Cancer Pract 1995 Mar-Apr;3(2):7682.
4.Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, Edwards KR, Cleeland CS. When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function. Pain 1995;61:277-84.
5.Stimmel B. Pain, analgesia and addiction: an approach to the pharmacological management of pain. Clin J Pain 1985;1:1422.
6.Foley KM. Current controversies in opioid therapy. Adv Pain Res Ther 1986;8:311.
7.McQuay HJ. Opioids in chronic pain. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:21326.
8.Portenoy RK. Chronic opioid therapy in nonmalignant pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1990;5(1 Suppl):546-62.
9.Portenoy RK. Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain: the issue revisited. APS Bull 1991;1(4):47.
10.Gupta MA. Is chronic pain a variant of depressive illness? A critical review. Can J Psychiatry 1986;31:2418.
11.Magni G. The use of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic pain: a review of the current evidence. Drugs 1991;42:73048.
12.Ready LB, Sarkis E, Turner JA. Selfreported vs. actual use of medications in chronic pain patients. Pain 1982;12:28594.
13.France RD. Chronic pain and depression. J Pain Symptom Manage 1987;2:2346.
14.Dubach UC, Rosner B, Pfister E. Epidemiological study of abuse of analgesics containing phenacetin: renal morbidity and mortality (1968-1979). N Engl J Med 1983;308:35762.
15.Sandler DP, Smith JC, Weinberg CR, Buckalew VM Jr, Dennis VW, Blythe WB, et al. Analgesic use and chronic renal disease. N Engl J Med 1989;320:123843.


To Clinical Contributions Index | To next Clinical Contributions article

To full contents list for this Journal >>

 

 


Home | The Journal | Subscribe | For Authors | CME | Announcements | Links | Staff | Contact Us


The Permanente Journal

500 NE Multnomah St., Suite 100,
Portland, OR 97232
503-813-3286 / fax: 503-813-2348


Copyright The Permanente Journal, Kaiser Permanente. All rights reserved